Scripture weighting is not a term you will find in Scripture. However, it’s a practice you may recognize when coming to conclusions about Scripture. Fundamentally, it’s the practice of ignoring Scripture. That might sound egregious — but it’s fairly rampant in the world of Bible study and theology.

A primary objective of this site is to encourage any/only/all Scripture to be considered when answering any question. It is our goal to look at all Scripture equally because that’s what God has instructed us to do. Scripture weighting is the opposite of this, and it commonly presents itself in three forms:

How Scripture answers "What is Scripture weighting?"

There is no precedent in Scripture for “Scripture Weighting.” Quite the contrary. All Scripture is divine and perfect;17 they are His words.5 God, the Father, is the sole author15. Further, it is only when taken in its entirety that we get a complete picture27. It is consistently put forward as equal weight since “all” is always the standard for understanding — Old46 and New13. Never has God said, “Read it all, but you really only need to focus on this part.”

May we never scripture weight – whether by authorship, testament, or presupposition. Instead, seek to gather all that Scripture has to say on the matter and only then make careful conclusions.

Can you guess which type of Scripture weighting applies to the following from gotquestions.org:

Question: “Does 1 Peter 3:21 teach that baptism is necessary for salvation?”
Answer: As with any single verse or passage, we discern what it teaches by first filtering it through what we know the Bible teaches on the subject at hand. In the case of baptism and salvation, the Bible is clear that salvation is by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, not by works of any kind, including baptism (Ephesians 2:8-9). So, any interpretation which comes to the conclusion that baptism, or any other act, is necessary for salvation, is a faulty interpretation.

Did you read that carefully? “We discern what it teaches by first filtering it through what we know the Bible teaches on the subject.” Says who? It’s circular reasoning. How can we know what the Bible teaches on a subject by doing any “filtering” of passages? They advocate relegating certain passages as “less than” others (e.g. scripture weighting). And, who or what determines the passage to be used as the filter?

This is classic presupposition. In this example, the doctrinal position is “faith only” and is based on a single, lifted passage – Ephesians 2:8-9. The last sentence may as well read, “So, any other passage which teaches that baptism, or any other act, is necessary for salvation, should be discarded.”

Hopefully, we can deal with Scripture honestly. Looking at what it says. Putting it in the proper context. Gathering any/only/all passages that might apply without Scripture weighting or disqualifying any part of God’s word.

Answer built on scripture-blocks below

Applying 2 Timothy 3:16-17 to this question...

An authoritative statement regarding the “equal footing” of Scripture and its single source.

Applying John 10:35-36 to this question...

Similar to, and even building on the 1 Timothy passage1, since Scripture is all equally important and comes from one source (God, the Father), Jesus adds the idea of “entirety” and “completeness.”

Applying 1 Corinthians 1:11-13 to this question...

Paul is condemning any precedent to be taken based on who the messenger was – they all preached the Gospel of Christ to no lesser or greater degree. This would include Christ Himself (and those well-intentioned ‘red-letter editions’). By including Christ in the list of “I follow” he is addressing those who might say, “Christ’s words were superior” (and thereby discounting Paul or Apollos or Cephas’ teaching).

Applying Deuteronomy 31:11-13 to this question...

The reading of the law (all of it) was to be the source (single) for not just the kings but for all the people.

Applying John 17:8 to this question...

The words that were spoken by Jesus and the disciples were all from God — one source. They weren’t their own.

Applying Luke 10:25-28 to this question...

In addressing his question, Jesus asks what is written in the Law — all of it. He expects the lawyer to assess/condense/conclude what is written in all of the Law which the lawyer correctly does — summing it up with two passages, equally applied (quite a brilliant assessment by the lawyer!!).

Applying Psalms 119:160 to this question...

Only “the sum” is truth, not just a part of it.

Leave your comment below…

…and if you’re wondering more about what we’re doing and why, here are some links we hope can help explain it (and maybe even get you excited about contributing):

what do you think?

related to 'What is Scripture weighting?'

lend your own study to the discussion

PUBLIC COMMENT POLICY: While your email is required, it will not be posted publically.
All comments are vetted for potential spam before being published, but will not be restricted otherwise.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted