This site is based on a scripture interprets scripture hermeneutic. It is rooted in the fact that all Scripture is from God, and that all scripture can be understood by anyone determined to do so.

Hermeneutics is the theory and methodology of interpretation, especially the interpretation of biblical texts, wisdom literature, and philosophical texts…The terms hermeneutics and exegesis are sometimes used interchangeably. Hermeneutics is a wider discipline which includes written, verbal, and non-verbal communication. Exegesis focuses primarily upon the word and grammar of texts. Wikipedia

In many ways, taking a position that scripture interprets scripture is diametrically opposed to the modern idea of Biblical hermeneutics. In fact, according to Wikipedia, prevailing approaches to interpretation within the domain of biblical hermeneutics includes such things as “layers of meaning”, “reader’s context”, and “trajectory hermeneutics.” So where does that leave the simple idea that Scripture interprets Scripture and where does it come from?

How Scripture answers "Who said scripture interprets scripture?"

God said that scripture interprets scripture1235611121517. Furthermore, it is the only practice for interpretation we see in the Bible347891013141617. We never see someone consulting alternative sources or human wisdom3. We are commanded not to go beyond what is written15. The entirety of Scripture forms a complete picture289101213. The very idea that God is the sole author16 forces the conclusion that Scripture cannot contradict itself5 and must also fully interpret itself since God cannot lie.

We still must draw conclusions and/or teach/explain as needed7914. Jesus required the lawyer to form a conclusion after reading it10 (and only it15). Scripture is the sole source for morality and obedience…it was this way for those under the Law478101617 (“Scripture” for that time) as well as for those (like Timothy1 and us) under the Law of Christ391113141517.

The Bible Study Framework is built specifically for the purpose of “forcing” we humans to let Scripture interpret Scripture. We specifically want to steer away from the other human tendencies that might inhibit Scripture’s ability to interpret Scripture. Of course, there comes a point where we have to draw a conclusion. “What is this passage telling us?” We can still go wrong here, but the steps of the BSF are intended to keep us pointed in the right direction for the best possible conclusion…

Hopefully, we can deal with Scripture honestly. Looking at what it says. Putting it in the proper context of “all Scripture,” without going beyond Scripture with too much context. Gathering any, only, all passage(s) that might apply without Scripture weighting or disqualifying any part of God’s word because “it doesn’t fit” our preconceived belief or doctrine.

Answer built on scripture-blocks below

Applying 2 Timothy 3:16-17 to this question...

Scripture is the only thing authorized for Godly teaching and training. If it’s not complete and interpreting unto itself, then God has lied.

Applying John 10:35-36 to this question...

Similar to, and even building on the Timothy passage1, since Scripture is all equally important and comes from one source (God), Jesus adds the idea of “entirety” and “completeness.” It is a unit that cannot be broken.

Applying 1 Corinthians 2:11-13 to this question...

The message Paul and the apostles preached was a spiritual one, requiring interpretation with “spiritual truths” by “those who are spiritual”. They are not taught or interpreted through/by human wisdom.

Extra Context for this Application:

Paul takes the entire first four chapters of 1 Corinthians to make this point.

Applying Deuteronomy 31:11-13 to this question...

The reading of the law (all of it) was to be the source (single) for not just the kings but for all the people.

Applying 1 Corinthians 14:33 to this question...

Paul is making a universal statement about God’s character that can be applied to the inerrancy of Scripture (since it comes from God).

Applying 2 Peter 1:19-21 to this question...

The words of Scripture are God’s words and were not “filtered” or given their own meaning by those who were “carried along” to write them.

Applying Nehemiah 8:8 to this question...

God’s law (Scripture) was the only source of the people’s knowledge of God’s will. Its reading and hearing didn’t eliminate the need to explain or teach it meaning as needed for everyone’s understanding.

Applying Matthew 4:1-2 to this question...

Jesus is tempted by Satan in the wilderness for 40 days and nights.

Extra Context for this Application:

In each temptation, Satan either uses direct scripture or a scriptural principle to justify his claim. On the surface, Satan’s statements are not false except when Jesus expands the thought or principle with additional Scripture. In each case, Jesus applies the ‘Scripture interprets Scripture’ principle.

Applying Acts 28:23-24 to this question...

Paul preaches the gospel message (kingdom of God and Jesus) using the Law and Prophets.

Applying Luke 10:25-28 to this question...

At Jesus’ behest, the lawyer correctly concluded what was required to inherit eternal life, not from any explicit passage but from the full body of work in the Law and Prophets.

Applying 1 Peter 4:10-11 to this question...

In the broader context of serving one another, Peter is counseling Christians to speak encouraging words, being mindful to stay within the authority of God’s word.

Applying Psalms 119:160 to this question...

All of God’s word, together, equals truth.

Applying 2 Timothy 1:13-14 to this question...

It wasn’t only the “sound words” that Timothy was to continue in, but their “pattern” or, like a puzzle, how they work together.

Applying 2 John 1:9-11 to this question...

We are not permitted to get in front of or add to God’s word. We must “abide in the teaching of Christ.”

Applying Deuteronomy 17:18-20 to this question...

Scripture’s care, preservation, and studying are demonstrated, giving us a principle of how God expects us to know Him and the means by which we know and understand.

Applying 1 Corinthians 15:3-5 to this question...

Paul’s argument for Jesus’ resurrection from the dead is “in accordance with the Scriptures”.

Leave your comment below…

…and if you’re wondering more about what we’re doing and why, here are some links we hope can help explain it (and maybe even get you excited about contributing):

what do you think?

related to 'Who said scripture interprets scripture?'

lend your own study to the discussion

PUBLIC COMMENT POLICY: While your email is required, it will not be posted publically.
All comments are vetted for potential spam before being published, but will not be restricted otherwise.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted