2 Peter 2:20-21
What is written? (ESV)
For if, after they have escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overcome, the last state has become worse for them than the first. For it would have been better for them never to have known the way of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandment delivered to them.
What does it say?
They would be better off remaining in their sins and worldliness, if, after turning from them because of the knowledge they have about Jesus their Savior, they turn back and again are ensnared. In other words, they would be better off never knowing the way of Christ and His holy commandments if they will only reject them later.
What is its immediate context?
Peter is concluding a lengthy instruction/warning about false teachers (2:1) rising up among them and embarks on a treatise about the danger of coming to a “swift destruction” (vs 1) and how “the way of truth will be blasphemed” (vs 2). He provides examples including some illuminating information re: angels (vs 4) and several more from the Old Testament including Noah (vs 5), Sodom and Gomorrah (vs 6), and Balaam (vs 15). This section closely parallels Jude 1 and Peter relates this process of one’s descent to spiritual destruction with Proverbs 26:11, “Like a dog that returns to his vomit is a fool who repeats his folly.”
How 2 Peter 2:20-21 is applied across Bible answers
Can repentance become impossible (Hebrews 6:4-6)?
Peter describes a situation exactly parallel to what the Hebrews writer describes1.
Throughout the chapter, Peter relates several Old Testament examples where repentance became impossible.
Does man have free will?
A very similar statement to what the Hebrews writer states,12 describing a condition in which a person has chosen a path of righteousness and then turned back and rejected it.
In this context, the "they/them" could go back to vs 1 (a false teacher), or be those that have listened to the false teacher, or more likely, both.


