You’ve probably seen a red letter Bible. In fact, you probably own one. A red-letter Bible places all of Jesus’ words in prominent red letters in order to stand out from all the other recorded words in Scripture. The red letter Bible is one of the many modern introductions to published Bibles along with the chapter/verse breaks and chapter/paragraph headings.

Jesus was the Son of God. It’s understandable that reading Jesus’ words in our red letter Bible might garner special attention or cause one to sit up and take notice. While there’s nothing wrong with that, it is interesting that He never wrote anything down. That’s a fact. Imagine the homage that might be paid to a Gospel or Epistle written in Jesus’ own hand? There could be some other unintended consequences. A few of these are called out in this, “The Problem with Red Letter Bibles” from the Gentleman Theologian. But we don’t really need to rely on man’s wisdom for this question…

How Scripture answers "Are Jesus’ words (red letter Bible) more important than other Scripture?"

The words of Scripture are the words of God – all of them – regardless of who spoke them124678912. Jesus (or the apostles8) were not speaking or teaching something different from person to person. They all were united in, and messengers of the “all truth” of, God the Father91112. It was the same with Moses10 and the prophets7 who spoke God’s literal word.

If you are, or want to be, a disciple of Jesus you must continue in God’s word regardless of who spoke it or where it’s recorded in our our Old Testaments23457. Jesus brought the final word in the New Covenant1011, and He2912 removes any doubt that we are to give special weight to the one who spoke them.

Answer built on scripture-blocks below

Applying John 17:8 to this question...

Jesus Himself acknowledges that the words He spoke were from God. He was, in a sense, the conduit and passed the words on to the apostles.

Extra Context for this Application:

In His prayer to the Father, Jesus further states, “I have given them your word” (vs 14) and goes on to say that all future believers will believe “through their word”2.

Applying John 17:20-21 to this question...

Jesus prays for all those that will believe in Him because of “their word” (the apostles’).

Applying 2 Thessalonians 2:15 to this question...

Paul refers to the things they had been taught as from the apostles.

Applying 1 Corinthians 1:11-13 to this question...

Paul is rebuking those who elevate any preacher/teacher of the gospel above another, even listing Christ. Obviously, Jesus Christ is the one they all followed and taught, but the message came from the Father.

Applying Acts 2:42 to this question...

Jesus has ascended to heaven at this point, yet it’s not “Jesus’ words” or “Jesus’ teaching” that the author, Luke, emphasizes. Instead, he calls it the “apostles’ teaching”.

Extra Context for this Application:

This is especially poignant since Jesus’ ascension was “not many days” prior (Acts 1:5) and his absence was still very much felt by the disciples.

Applying Proverbs 30:5-6 to this question...

It is in “every word of God” (and God only) that truth is found.

Applying Ephesians 2:19-22 to this question...

Jesus’ words/message are central and critical, but just as any foundation cannot exist without a cornerstone (and vis-a-versa), “saints and members” of God’s household (the church universal) cannot exist without the words of the “apostles and prophets” (e.g. the Bible).

Applying Acts 1:1-2 to this question...

Luke opens his second volume by saying that his first was only what “Jesus began to do and teach”. This implies that the book of Acts is a continuation of Jesus’ teaching, even though it was by proxy through the apostles12.

Applying John 7:15-18 to this question...

Jesus said that His teaching was explicitly not His, but His Father’s.

Applying Matthew 17:3-5 to this question...

The Father commands that His Son is the one who should be listened to over Moses and Elijah.

Extra Context for this Application:

God, the Father, isn’t saying that what Moses and Elijah said was inccorect or irrelvant, but that now that His Son has had the ‘final’ word.

Applying Hebrews 1:1-2 to this question...

Jesus represents the culmination of the Father’s message/word to/for His people.

Applying John 12:49-50 to this question...

The words Jesus spoke were the Father’s, not His own.

Leave your comment below…

…and if you’re wondering more about what we’re doing and why, here are some links we hope can help explain it (and maybe even get you excited about contributing):

what do you think?

related to 'Are Jesus’ words (red letter Bible) more important than other Scripture?'

lend your own study to the discussion

PUBLIC COMMENT POLICY: While your email is required, it will not be posted publically.
All comments are vetted for potential spam before being published, but will not be restricted otherwise.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted