Bible students often wonder about the Old Testament vs. the New Testament. It may stem from just a basic lack of differences between the Old Testament vs. the New Testament. But more often it seems to be rooted in questioning whether any application exists for today’s Christian in the Old Testament vs. the New Testament. From the “Top List” series, here are our top reasons why it shouldn’t be about Old Testament vs. New Testament, but rather Old Testament equals New Testament.

How Scripture answers "Top 3: Why ‘Old Testament vs. New Testament’ isn’t the best approach?"

Our top three reasons why Christian’s should approach the Bible acknowledging that the Old Testament equals New Testament, instead of Old Testament vs. New Testament:

  1. Old Testament doesn’t equal ‘Old Covenant’ and New Testament doesn’t equal ‘New Covenant’.12 This a critical fact to remember and what many discussions about ‘Old Testament vs. New Testament’ confuse. The Old Covenant (the Mosaic law with its Ten Commandments) described in the Old Testament was indeed replaced by Christ with the New Covenant described in the New Testament. However, the Old Covenant did not begin until approximately 2,500 years into the Old Testament1. Likewise, the New Covenant did not begin until after Jesus’ death2 which would exclude the time during the four Gospels.
  2. It’s all from the same source (God).5789 The Old Testament is every bit God’s word. Two immutable facts make this an undeniable reality that would reject an Old Testament vs. New Testament approach:
  3. How we see the Old Testament represented in the New Testament.
    • Jesus didn’t “oppose” the Old Testament when He was asked about it412.
    • Inspired New Testament writers repeatedly use the Old Testament to confirm or prove their teaching57810111314. Likewise, first-century Christians use it to confirm New Covenant teaching56.
    • It’s explicitly cited for Christians to use for their instruction13 and example9.

Answer built on scripture-blocks below

Applying Exodus 24:7-8 to this question...

The very moment the children of Israel entered into the Old Covenant (Mosaic Law) with God, coming only after approaximately some 2,500 years of recorded history from Genesis 1.

Applying Hebrews 9:15-17 to this question...

The New Covenant did not commence until after the death of its “mediator” – Jesus Christ.

Applying Malachi 3:6 to this question...

God doesn’t change.

Applying Matthew 5:17-18 to this question...

Jesus wasn’t canceling or abolishing the Mosaic Law and God’s prophets who preached it, which is the majority of our modern Old Testament). He was fulfilling or building on to it.

Applying 2 Timothy 3:14-15 to this question...

Paul tells Timothy not to unlearn the “sacred writings” (e.g. Old Testament) since they will provide the necessary wisdom to be saved. Note: It doesn’t say that it saves him, that’s “through faith in Jesus Christ”, but it is necessary for his further sanctification.

Extra Context for this Application:

Paul continues, “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.” (vss 16-17) The Old Testament was necesary for Timothy to be “complete”.

Applying Acts 17:10-11 to this question...

After hearing Paul’s preaching on the New Covenant, the Bereans “tested” his words against the Old Testament (their “scriptures”).

Applying Galatians 3:7-9 to this question...

Paul goes all the way back to Abraham (Genesis 11 – pre-Mosaic Law) to relate and explain what ‘New Covenant faith’ was all about, and what Christians share with Abraham.

Applying Galatians 3:21-22 to this question...

The Old Law is not contrary to the New Law.

Extra Context for this Application:

Paul goes on to point out that the Old Law was a tutor to lead us to Christ. (vs 24)

Applying 1 Corinthians 10:6 to this question...

Christians are to use what is found in the Old Testament as an example in order to not fall from grace as some of them did.

Applying 2 Peter 3:5-7 to this question...

Peter points all the way back to Creation (Genesis 1) and Noah (Genesis 11) to make a point about awaiting Jesus’ return.

Applying Romans 13:8-10 to this question...

Paul quotes from portions of the Old Testament and relates them to how Christians should love one another and thus fulfill God’s commands.

Applying John 5:39-40 to this question...

Jesus points to the Old Testament as a witness to Himself and who He is.

Applying Romans 15:2-4 to this question...

Paul, through inspiration, proves a New Covenant principle by citing a verse from a Psalm in the Old Testament and goes on to make the general point that the Old Testament is for the New Testament Christian’s instruction.

Applying Acts 24:14-15 to this question...

Paul, as a New Covenant believer, confesses a belief in “everything” written in the Law and Prophets (our modern Old Testaments).

Leave your comment below…

…and if you’re wondering more about what we’re doing and why, here are some links we hope can help explain it (and maybe even get you excited about contributing):

what do you think?

related to 'Top 3: Why ‘Old Testament vs. New Testament’ isn’t the best approach?'

lend your own study to the discussion

PUBLIC COMMENT POLICY: While your email is required, it will not be posted publically.
All comments are vetted for potential spam before being published, but will not be restricted otherwise.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted