This question is asked by Holger Neubauer, a preacher for a church of Christ in Michigan (as of the date of publishing), in a video published via social media (between roughly the 3-9 minute marks). At issue is the idea that “the gift of the Holy Spirit” in Acts 2:381 could be anything other than a miracle, akin to what’s recorded in Acts 84 and Acts 195.

After quoting Acts 2:38 and beginning verse 39, Holger Neubauer gives this explanation for Peter’s transition from “the gift” in verse 38 to “the promise” in verse 39, “Now the promise is the promise of salvation, the gift is the sealing or the guarantee of that salvation but the gift is not the promise.” He goes on to quote the rest of verse 39 and says, “Now that’s salvation. The promise refers directly back to the Abrahamic promise of Genesis 12:1-3 and the gift of the Holy Spirit is the confirmation that those promises would be delivered.” He continues to say the apostles laid hands on the 3,000 (*4:06) — something the text never says. He concludes by asking, “Why would God give the non-miraculous gift of the Spirit?!…The idea of a non-miraculous gift of the Spirit? That’s ridiculous!” (*8:35)

How Scripture answers "Why does God give the non-miraculous gift of the Holy Spirit? (Acts 2:38-39)"

God gives368915 the non-miraculous gift of the Holy Spirit because He promised it71112. It was part of His desire to dwell with His people61113 and one of many of God’s great promises comprising man’s redemption1279. The sending of His Son was also the Father’s great gift and promise. However, in Acts 2:38-391 it is the promise of “forgiveness of sin”1112 and the promise of the Holy Spirit91213 (e.g. “the gift of the Holy Spirit”89) that Peter directly connects to the great promise of salvation for everyone that’s baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus134579.

Any attempt to disconnect the gift of God’s Spirit (e.g. the personal indwelling of the Spirit) for all “those who obey Him”3 would also require disconnecting “forgiveness of sin”. Doing that is a direct rejection of God’s grace since it is God who gives38915 this non-miraculous gift of the Spirit, not an apostle through their laying on of hands! Jesus foretold what Peter announced1 when He said kingdom entrance would require being “born of water and the Spirit”2 – the one baptism14 for all God’s elect.

The bottom line: The non-miraculous gift of the Holy Spirit is foundational to God’s promise(s)679111213. God’s gift of the Spirit1381215 through rebirth214 (e.g. water baptism) is what makes one holy and sanctified71015 for His dwelling6111213.

 Non-miraculous Gift of the SpiritMiraculous Gifts of the Spirit
For the benefit of whom?The individual123 for their salvationOthers for their confidence that the message was from God
Administered by whom?God38915 when one is baptized in the name of Jesus Christ129Apostles, when they laid hands on someone45
For what purpose?Making one holy for God’s dwelling7111213 and sanctification of the individual710Confirming the authority and words of God’s messengers
In effect when?With the new covenant1211 until He returns910Ended once the word was fully confirmed (1st century)
The AD70 doctrine (“Preterism”) is an insidious false doctrine that twists just about every basic principle of the New Covenant. It takes very plain and simple to understand statements and contorts them into a pretzel of confusing rhetoric (which probably explains why they will only substantially engage in a “public debate”).

In this case, it’s the Holy Spirit falling victim to the preterist’s convoluted logic and parsing of scripture. This doctrine robs the modern Christian of their Comforter and Helper. This “other baptism” denies converts of God’s desire and long-promised gift.

A broader set of questions are arranged around this false doctrine, but here are some specific to this misguided preterist’s twisting of Peter’s clear statement in Acts. The following deploy even more scripture, all of which fit together harmoniously to present a proper understanding of the Holy Spirit for a new covenant Christian.

  • What is the promise of the Holy Spirit? – goes hand-in-hand with Holger’s question
  • Where is the Holy Spirit dwelling today? – in every baptized believer, not just those ‘pre-AD70’ as taught by Holger (“Those who are baptized before AD70, and those who are baptized after AD70.”)
  • What does the Holy Spirit do for the Christian today? – all of these forced to be profoundly (and sadly) lacking for today’s Christian with the Preterist’s false doctrine
  • What was the purpose for miracles? – concluded since the word has been fully revealed; together with those miraculous “gifts” of the Holy Spirit (not to be confused with Peter’s “gift” of the Holy Spirit1) they served OTHERS to confirm the word of God’s messengers. The “gift” is for ALL that obey3 and continues today just as it did for those in Acts 2:38-391; the “gifts” were for the benefit of OTHERS and ceased when their purpose was fulfilled.

Answer built on scripture-blocks below

Applying Acts 2:37-39 to this question...

Peter says to repent and be baptized for the (1) forgiveness of your sins, and (2) gift of the Holy Spirit. Collectively, this is “the promise” of salvation for “everyone whom the Lord our God calls to Himself.” Salvation is both forgiveness of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit. They are a package made available to anyone that obeys23 in baptism.

(Holger Neubauer says “The ‘gift’ is not the ‘promise'” (*3:40) but Peter makes no such delineation.)

Applying John 3:3-5 to this question...

Jesus tells Nicodemus that in order to see the kingdom of God, one must be reborn. Specifically, they must be “born of water and the Spirit.”

Applying Acts 5:30-32 to this question...

God gives His Holy Spirit to all/anyone/everyone who obey Him.

Applying Acts 8:14-19 to this question...

The specific issue in question here is the miraculous power of the Holy Spirit, which was only “given through the laying on of the apostles’ hands.” The text is clear that these were baptized believers. Therefore, they had forgiveness of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit1 (unlike what Paul found in Ephesus5). What they were lacking were the miraculous gifts of the Spirit since an apostle had not yet laid hands on them.

Applying Acts 19:1-6 to this question...

Paul finds disciples and wants to determine their saved state. His first question was, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” Unlike the disciples in Samaria4 who had already been “baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus”, these disciples had only been baptized “into John’s baptism”. Paul equates one knowing that they’ve “received the Holy Spirit” with the same initial state of one’s conversion. Since they had “not even heard that there was a Holy Spirit,” Paul “baptized them in the name of the Lord Jesus” (for the forgiveness of their sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit1). Now with his first question properly answered and them being cleansed and made holy, only then does Paul lay his hands on them so that “they began speaking in tongues and prophesying” (e.g. miraculous gifts of the Spirit).

Applying 2 Corinthians 6:16-18 to this question...

Paul iterates the fact that the Christian individually (and church collectively) is the “temple of the living God” based on “promises”7 made by God through several prophets (including several listed here111213).

Applying 2 Corinthians 7:1 to this question...

Continuing his thought,6 Paul confirms God’s “dwelling” as a promise from God and integral to a Christian’s motivation to “cleanse ourselves from every defilement”.

Applying 2 Corinthians 1:21-22 to this question...

Paul testifies to God’s gift of the Spirit (e.g. “anointed us”) in baptism1 and reiterates the promise He made through the prophets.111213

(Holger Neubauer says, “The sealing, and the anointing, and the guarantee are synonymous expressions.” (*4:18) Yes, but “anointing” doesn’t have to mean “miraculous” and Paul makes no such assertion or implication.)

Applying Ephesians 1:13-14 to this question...

Paul summarizes the Ephesian Christian’s salvation experience, which is exactly as those in Jerusalem experienced.1 They heard the word, believed, and obeyed in baptism (i.e. “they were marked and sealed with the promised Holy Spirit”). This “gift of the Holy Spirit”1 for the saved individual is “the believer’s down payment” for “full redemption” when He returns.

(A passage that’s especially problematic for Holger Neubauer since he must force some kind of interpretation that justifies the preterist’s core belief that Jesus already returned. Note that the conclusion is made before the natural reading of the passage and its perfect harmony with the rest of scripture.)

Applying 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14 to this question...

Those that are saved are those that believed the word (e.g. “truth”) and were set apart or made holy (e.g. “sanctification”) by the Spirit. This salvation is so that one might “obtain the glory of…Christ” upon His return.

(A passage that’s especially problematic for Holger Neubauer since he must force some kind of interpretation that justifies the preterist’s core belief that Jesus already returned. Note that the conclusion is made before the natural reading of the passage and its perfect harmony with the rest of scripture.)

Applying Jeremiah 31:31-34 to this question...

The promise of a new covenant between God and His people when He will put His law “within them” and it will be written “on their hearts.” He also promises the forgiveness of sins.

Applying Ezekiel 36:25-27 to this question...

God through Ezekiel promises a time when He will put His Spirit in His people – specifically, those that “obey My rules.”

Applying Zechariah 2:10-11 to this question...

God promises through the prophet Zechariah that He will dwell among His people which will include “many nations” (e.g. Gentiles).

Applying Ephesians 4:4-6 to this question...

There is only one baptism that belongs to or is part of God’s call.

Applying 1 Thessalonians 4:7-8 to this question...

God, the Fathger, is the one who gives the Holy Spirit – His Spirit.

Leave your comment below…

…and if you’re wondering more about what we’re doing and why, here are some links we hope can help explain it (and maybe even get you excited about contributing):

what do you think?

related to 'Why does God give the non-miraculous gift of the Holy Spirit? (Acts 2:38-39)'

lend your own study to the discussion

PUBLIC COMMENT POLICY: While your email is required, it will not be posted publically.
All comments are vetted for potential spam before being published, but will not be restricted otherwise.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted