The inward call versus the outward call. Many today distinguish these as two different types of Godly or heavenly ‘callings’. Dividing the spiritual callings found in scripture between an ‘inward call’ and an ‘outward call’ is perpetuated at least in part by teachings credited to John Calvin.

“Calvinism”, or more currently labeled Reformed or Reformed Protestantism, is a Christian theological framework that stands on five points understood by the mnemonic TULIP. The idea of an “inward call” comes into play under the doctrine of irresistible grace. Specifically, the “inward call” is distinguished as the call from God that can’t be refused. This is due, at least in part, to being infused with the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. After all, who could refuse the Holy Spirit?

T-U-L-I-P

A popularly recognized pneumatic representing the “pillars” of John Calvin’s teaching.

(aka “total inability”) Every person who is enslaved to sin as a result of the fall of man and further, is not inclined to love God. Instead, man’s nature is to reject the rule of God and serve themselves. As a result, no human has the moral capacity to choose to obey God for spiritual salvation. Their sin (“depravity”) affects every part of them (“total”). Calvin’s “total depravity” doctrine is based on his interpretation of Augustine’s definition of Original Sin.

From the beginning, God chose individuals who he would call his own. This was not based on any foreseen virtue, merit, or faith in those people. Instead, his selection is unconditional (e.g. unilateral) and based only on his mercy. He extends mercy and salvation in Christ Jesus to those chosen (the “elect”). Those not chosen are separated from him because of their sins, receiving his wrath.

(aka “particular redemption” or “definite atonement” or “particular atonement”) Because of God’s complete sovereignty over man, the sins of the elect – and only the elect – were atoned for by Jesus’ death.

(aka “efficacious grace”) God’s saving grace is effectually applied to those whom he has determined to save (that is, the elect). By his sovereignty, he overcomes any resistance to obeying the call of the gospel, bringing them to a saving faith. After all, he has purposed this from the beginning (“Unconditional election”). Here a distinction is made with the Holy Spirit’s “outward call” (preaching of the Gospel) that goes to all (elect and non-elect). It is only this “outward call” that can be rejected by sinners, whereas the “inward call” (or “effectual call”) of the Holy Spirit’s saving grace cannot be rejected (e.g “irresistible”).

(aka “perseverance of God with the saints” and “preservation of the believing”) God’s sovereignty precludes any who have received his “inward call” to be lost.  These “elect” will definitively be saved.

How Scripture answers "Is there an inward call of God?"

Nowhere does Scripture speak of an explicit “inward call” (vs an “outward call”). More accurately, we see Scripture speak of one, higher14, holy18 call12345678910111213151617 discussed at different times by inspired writers in terms that effect the individual inwardly13578111215161718 and/or outwardly245691012131416.

By allowing Scripture to interpret Scripture we see that one may respond to the gospel call245691618. Those who respond with belief and obedience59101213 (and not just in one moment in time78141518) are given God’s Holy Spirit as a dwelling38911 and are subsequently encouraged to remain true to their calling134678101112131415161718 until death. Taken together, this is how we see “calling on the name of the Lord” defined in Scripture.

Answer built on scripture-blocks below

Applying Ephesians 1:15-18 to this question...

Paul refers to the fact of the Christian’s “calling,” but nothing indicates it is “inward” (or “outward”). It

Extra Context for this Application:

Later in the same letter, Paul will emphasize the ‘oneness’ of the calling and hope that he highlights here.3

Applying Matthew 22:14 to this question...

Jesus speaks in relative terms to distinguish between two results (we would say responses) to a single call. There is only one call referenced here, from which some (“few”) are “chosen”.

Applying Ephesians 4:4-6 to this question...

Paul’s whole point is unity [of the Spirit] and the single (unified) aspects of their spiritual calling.

Applying 1 Corinthians 7:17-19 to this question...

Based on the context, Paul is talking here about one’s vocation or circumstance in life (in physical terms). That is what “God has called him” to in life. He then compares that to one’s spiritual calling (e.g. “the time of his call”). Restated, Paul is saying that whatever one’s station in life is at the time of his conversion is secondary to one’s new calling as a Christian. The only thing that really matters now is that they remain obedient to God’s commandments.

Extra Context for this Application:

Paul goes on to give another example of a slave and says that if you can become a freedman, then that’s great (vs 21), but ultimately, given your new, higher calling, make sure to “remain with God” (vs 24).

Applying Acts 16:14 to this question...

God opened Lydia’s heart to “pay attention” to Paul’s message (the gospel). Subsequently, she believed and obeyed (was baptized). Scripture only says that God opened her heart to “pay attention”.

Applying Galatians 1:6-9 to this question...

Although no mention of any particular kind of calling, Paul does describe what some define as the “outward call” (the gospel preached). He says this to those who would have received the “inward call” (Christians). Why would Paul be giving this lengthy warning about turning to “a different gospel” (essentially, a different “outward call”) if they are fully secure in their “inward call”?

Applying Galatians 4:8-9 to this question...

Later in the same letter,6 Paul makes the same plea again about them falling away. However, instead of talking about their having responded to the gospel, here he describes it as the mutual “becoming known” – them to God, and God to them. No mention of an “inward call” nor any caveat regarding the surety of that calling.

Applying Hebrews 6:4-6 to this question...

The writer is clearly speaking to those who would have received the “inward call” since they have “shared in the Holy Spirit.” Nevertheless, he warns them about falling away…why would he do that?

Applying 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14 to this question...

Paul states clearly that the “brothers” were called by God “through our gospel”. The gospel is the calling, not distinguished as an “inward” or an “outward”.

Applying 1 John 1:6-7 to this question...

If there is an irresistible, inward call, why is John warning those that he clearly believes have received the “inward call” to “walk in the light”?

Applying 1 Thessalonians 4:7-8 to this question...

There is one calling here (God’s) and Paul warns about a Christian’s ability to “disregard” it, even in spite of His giving of His Spirit. To “disregard” God, is to reject God.

Applying Galatians 5:24 to this question...

Those who “belong to Christ” in this passage are those already saved and who Paul is encouraging to “walk by the Spirit” (vs 16) and not be “severed from Christ” (vs 4) due to living in the flesh. Paul never mentions their “inward call” but instead appeals to their free moral agency to obey…even while teaching that they are “led by the Spirit” (v. 18).

Applying 1 Peter 1:14-16 to this question...

Peter describes someone’s “call on Him” (God the Father) as an outward obedience.

Extra Context for this Application:

Immediately prior (vs 16), Peter mentions God’s call to them in the context of a call to be holy (quoting Leviticus).

Applying Philippians 3:13-14 to this question...

There is an “upward call” (e.g. higher calling) to which we should all strive. It is from God and through Christ.

Applying 1 Thessalonians 2:11-12 to this question...

Paul exhorted, encouraged, and charged Christians to live (e.g. “walk”) in a way that was worthy of God’s call into His Kingdom and glory. God’s “calling” is ongoing, regardless of the individual Christian’s walk.

Applying Romans 6:17-18 to this question...

While “calling” isn’t referenced here, Paul describes two aspects of a Christian’s single call – their initial repentance coming “from the heart” (inward) and an ongoing “obedience” and commitment to the teaching (outward).

Applying Romans 1:7 to this question...

All Christians (e.g. “saints”) were “called” by God.

Applying 2 Timothy 1:8-9 to this question...

Paul and Timothy shared in a “holy calling” – not because of who they were or the special roles they played in God’s kingdom, but because they were saved by grace (like all other Christians).

Leave your comment below…

…and if you’re wondering more about what we’re doing and why, here are some links we hope can help explain it (and maybe even get you excited about contributing):

what do you think?

related to 'Is there an inward call of God?'

lend your own study to the discussion

PUBLIC COMMENT POLICY: While your email is required, it will not be posted publically.
All comments are vetted for potential spam before being published, but will not be restricted otherwise.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
David Norfleet

2 Thessalonians 2:13-14 points to the means of calling – the gospel.