The apostle Peter writes that “the end of all things is at hand”1 in the first of two letters to Christians that had been scattered abroad. This verse can raise some questions in regards to the expression “at hand.” Some understand, even insist, that Peter was writing that final judgment and the second coming of Jesus (“the end of all things”) was going to imminently take place (“is at hand”). In fact, the claim is that “at hand” always means imminence.

At least in this case, it does seem like Peter could be saying that the end was about to happen. In fact, one could also point to the use of “at hand” when both John the Baptist declared the “kingdom of heaven is at hand”9. Indeed, the kingdom of heaven did come just a few years later. So was the end of all things at hand when Peter wrote in the first century?

How Scripture answers "Was the end of all things at hand (1 Peter 4:7)?"

There are several reasons why Peter’s statement “the end of all things is at hand”1 was not a declaration of Jesus’ imminent return. In fact, it was a statement about Jesus’ certain, or inevitable, return. In this context1, Peter is expressing urgency (“at hand”) for his real point to urge these Christians to be ready!

Remember, Peter didn’t have the authority to even speak about the timing of Jesus’ return8. Rather, he wanted to impress a sense of urgency for their continued obedience since Jesus’ return was inevitable. (This fact alone requires that none of the New Testament writers – or Jesus Himself8 – wrote concerning the exact or approximate timing of Jesus’ return. Otherwise, they make Jesus a liar!)

But we can pull the contextual lens further back and look forward to Peter’s second epistle to this same audience for even more clarity. The final third of Peter’s second letter2 is dedicated to squashing any notion that he or they should be focused on the timing aspect8 of Jesus’ return. Rather, again, he addresses its inevitability and their need to be ready2.

Full and harmonious clarity comes if we pull the context lens all the way back, as it were, to examine all Scripture. Indeed, all the New Testament writers pleaded for urgency in one’s obedience in the same way that Peter did1. We also find other “at hand” statements expressing this same inevitability3456710. Of course, some do speak of imminence910, but definitely not all1234567810.

Answer built on scripture-blocks below

Applying 1 Peter 4:7-9 to this question...

Peter encourages Christians to remain faithful because the “end of all things is at hand”.

Applying 2 Peter 3:8 to this question...

Peter states a truth about the great disparity between God’s time and man’s.

Extra Context for this Application:

All of chapter three seems to be a clarification from his first letter about the end being “at hand”1. Indeed, some were expecting Jesus’ return to be imminent (vs 4). Yet, Peter illustrates the vastness of God’s time by pointing all the way back to the creation and flood (vss 5,6) – thousands of years earlier. What? Thousands of years, Peter? “The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness,” Peter retorts (vs 9), and goes on as if to clarify, now describing Jesus’ return as a “thief in the night” (vs 10).

Applying Deuteronomy 32:34-35 to this question...

God foretells His judgment on the people. A judgment that wouldn’t happen for hundreds of years, yet it’s spoken by God as “at hand” and inevitable.

Extra Context for this Application:

A song of Moses that by its very essence and main message of eventual condemnation contrasts the “in time” of man with the timelessness of God.

Applying Isaiah 46:12-13 to this question...

God speaks of the “salvation in Zion” – a clear foreshadowing of the Messiah – in terms that are “not far off” and “will not delay”…even though it’s many hundreds of years away.

Extra Context for this Application:

Just a few verses earlier, God makes the exact point to Judah that Peter makes to Christians2. Particularly verse 10, “declaring the end from the beginning and from ancient times things not yet done, saying, ‘My counsel shall stand, and I will accomplish all my purpose.'” God will follow through in His time.

Applying Romans 13:11-12 to this question...

Paul uses “at hand” to describe the present reality, not something yet to come at all. It was an immutable state of the present condition.

Applying Obadiah 1:15-16 to this question...

God’s judgment is certain and fixed on all the unrighteous.

Extra Context for this Application:

This could certainly be an extension of the preceding judgment upon Edom. However, as is typical with God’s judgments through the prophets, it moves to a future time and/or the ultimate or final judgment.

Applying Isaiah 13:6-7 to this question...

Much like Obadiah’s “part two”6, God through Isaiah shifts to appear to be speaking of the final “day of the Lord” – it is “near”, as in, “it will come.” It is inevitable.

Extra Context for this Application:

The chapter begins and ends discussing God’s judgment on Babylon some 150+ years later. In addition to it being “near” (e.g. certain), God concludes by stating “its time is close at hand and its days will not be prolonged” (vs 22).

Applying Matthew 24:36-37 to this question...

Jesus states a universal truth that only God the Father knows when the second coming of Christ will be.

Applying Matthew 2:1-2 to this question...

John the Baptist preached that the kingdom of God was near or “at hand.”

Applying Zephaniah 1:7 to this question...

God’s “great day” is not only emphatically “near” (repeated twice), but coming “fast”.

Extra Context for this Application:

While Zephaniah is clearly speaking of a “day of the Lord” that’s coming for Judah, he’s also clearly speaking of Messiah as well as final (e.g. “the end”) judgment. Zephaniah expresses both the imminence (for Judah) as well as the inevitability (500+ years for Messiah and still awaiting a “final”).

Leave your comment below…

…and if you’re wondering more about what we’re doing and why, here are some links we hope can help explain it (and maybe even get you excited about contributing):

what do you think?

related to 'Was the end of all things at hand (1 Peter 4:7)?'

lend your own study to the discussion

PUBLIC COMMENT POLICY: While your email is required, it will not be posted publically.
All comments are vetted for potential spam before being published, but will not be restricted otherwise.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Charlie Brackett

Peter’s use of “at hand” in 1 Peter 4:7 brings to mind two thoughts. First, in the heavenly context time means nothing. One day is as a thousand years. And, on earth no one can be sure of continued life. Death is always unpredictably imminent. I believe Peter is telling us to be ready, always ready. We cannot know when this life is over and we are in the timelessness of eternity.