The doctrine of original sin is typically credited to Augustine of Hippo (334-430), but he credits Irenaeus of Lyon, Bishop of Lyon (130-202). It’s a belief widely held between both Catholic and Protestant Christian religions. While the doctrine of original sin has taken many shapes over the centuries, it fundamentally declares that all sin is inherited from Adam, and in its truest form, all humans since Adam bear the guilt of his “original sin.”

Protestant reformers Martin Luther (1483-1546) and John Calvin (1509-1564) adopted and carried the idea even further. They considered that the guilt of original sin completely overwhelmed an individual’s free will to choose not to sin. In the Westminster Larger Catechism it is stated as, “All mankind…sinned in him [Adam], and fell with him in that first transgression… The sinfulness of that estate whereinto man fell, consisteth in the guilt of Adam’s first sin.” (Questions 25 and 26)

T-U-L-I-P

A popularly recognized pneumatic representing the “pillars” of John Calvin’s teaching.

(aka “total inability”) Every person who is enslaved to sin as a result of the fall of man and further, is not inclined to love God. Instead, man’s nature is to reject the rule of God and serve themselves. As a result, no human has the moral capacity to choose to obey God for spiritual salvation. Their sin (“depravity”) affects every part of them (“total”). Calvin’s “total depravity” doctrine is based on his interpretation of Augustine’s definition of Original Sin.

From the beginning, God chose individuals who he would call his own. This was not based on any foreseen virtue, merit, or faith in those people. Instead, his selection is unconditional (e.g. unilateral) and based only on his mercy. He extends mercy and salvation in Christ Jesus to those chosen (the “elect”). Those not chosen are separated from him because of their sins, receiving his wrath.

(aka “particular redemption” or “definite atonement” or “particular atonement”) Because of God’s complete sovereignty over man, the sins of the elect – and only the elect – were atoned for by Jesus’ death.

(aka “efficacious grace”) God’s saving grace is effectually applied to those whom he has determined to save (that is, the elect). By his sovereignty, he overcomes any resistance to obeying the call of the gospel, bringing them to a saving faith. After all, he has purposed this from the beginning (“Unconditional election”). Here a distinction is made with the Holy Spirit’s “outward call” (preaching of the Gospel) that goes to all (elect and non-elect). It is only this “outward call” that can be rejected by sinners, whereas the “inward call” (or “effectual call”) of the Holy Spirit’s saving grace cannot be rejected (e.g “irresistible”).

(aka “perseverance of God with the saints” and “preservation of the believing”) God’s sovereignty precludes any who have received his “inward call” to be lost.  These “elect” will definitively be saved.

How Scripture answers "Is the doctrine of original sin taught in the Bible?"

Original sin is not taught anywhere in the Bible. In fact, many passages make it clear that an individual is responsible for their own sinfulness23671013. Furthermore, God the Father confirms the innocence of children,1011 which the Son reiterates with His teaching8.

There are some passages1459 used in an attempt to justify original sin. However, in each case, they instead perfectly harmonize with the rest of Scripture2367810111213. Scripture never teaches that the guilt of Adam’s sin is passed down to all mankind, rather:

  • David1 is lamenting the guilt he feels as a result of his own sin.
  • Paul in 1 Corinthians4 is drawing a physical comparison between Adam and Christ – Adam the first to physically die and Jesus the first to physically rise.
  • Paul in Romans5 is stating that Adam was the fist to sin and thus brought spiritual death into the world. That same thought is continued in Ephesians9 – that they are in sin and spiritually dead before putting on Christ.

All of these are making similar points regarding our sinful world149, the consequence of spiritual death that sin brings459, and that “in Christ”49 we can conquer death. They1459 testify that Scripture interprets Scripture!

We can all echo David’s lament.1 We have all sinned and it’s ever present in our lives and will lead to death. It is only through Jesus’ blood that we are cleansed, and we can contact that blood through baptism — dying to sin as He did, and being raised anew. Have you been washed in His blood?

This is an interpretation from Scripture that didn’t really come around until 2-300 years after Christ. Nevertheless, its tentacles permeate throughout Catholicism and most Protestant religions today. It’s as though the adoption of the one belief spawned other beliefs, effectively “forcing” them into existence to support the original belief. Logically, we might say that “If A, then B (and C, and D, and E…).”

For example, if all mankind not only suffers from a sin-cursed world because of the “first couple’s” sin, but also inherits the guilt of that first sin, then:

  • What do we do about Jesus, who was fully man and born of a woman, yet without sin? According to the doctrine of original sin, Jesus would be guilty of Adam’s sin. Well, not if we have a doctrine of immaculate conception, introduced around the seventh century, making Mary holy and thus pardoning her from the chain of guilt.
  • What do we do regarding infants that might die before they can be baptized, damning them to Hell? Voila, infant baptism fixes this, a practice that can’t be traced before 150BC.
  • Since the guilt of sin, as taught by this false doctrine, is passed on through human procreation, a sexual relationship in the marriage bed is frowned upon. Thus, [Catholic] Priests are forbidden to marry and the use of contraceptives is condemned by the Catholic Church.
  • Lest the Protestants get a pass on this pervasive false doctrine, John Calvin carries it forward and re-brand as “total depravity.” As a result, this doctrine manifests in many of the modern day Protestant teachings including “grace alone” and decoupling baptism’s direct effect of forgiveness of sins.

Answer built on scripture-blocks below

Applying Psalms 51:5 to this question...

David says that he was born in sin (eg. “iniquity”). Taken on its own, he could be saying several things: (1) he was born into sin, (2) he was born into a world of sin, or that sin is all around.

Extra Context for this Application:

The immediately preceding verses make it clear what David means when he writes vs 5. In verses 1-4 he writes, “Have mercy on me, O God, according to your steadfast love; according to your abundant mercy blot out my transgressions. Wash me thoroughly from my iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin! For I know my transgressions, and my sin is ever before me. Against you, you only, have I sinned and done what is evil in your sight…” David is lamenting his own, personal sin and the fact that it’s all around him.

Applying Genesis 6:11-12 to this question...

Pre-flood, the earth was condemned because everyone (except Noah) had devolved in their sinfulness to a point of no return.

Extra Context for this Application:

It has been generations since Adam (see chapter 5), yet their condemnation is due to their own devolving into corruption.

Applying Exodus 32:31-33 to this question...

When Moses suggests that he share the blame for the people’s sin, God answers that the guilt of an individual’s sin is borne by the individual alone. God makes this declarative statement as an eternal truth, even referencing “my book” (e.g. “book of life”). (Revelation 20:12).

Applying 1 Corinthians 15:21-22 to this question...

Paul is simply drawing a comparison with the fact that Adam was the first to physically die and Jesus was the first to physically rise (“be made alive”). It does not apply to the teaching of original sin based on its immediate context.

Extra Context for this Application:

In the entire chapter, Paul is teaching the physical resurrection of Jesus. He died in the flesh and was raised in the flesh.

Applying Romans 5:12-13 to this question...

It doesn’t given its context. Adam’s sin introduced sin into the world for all man, and death as a result (for all man). All are dead in their sin “because all sinned”. To say that “sin came into the world through one man” does not logically necessitate the transference and guilt of Adam’s sin to all descendants.

Applying Acts 3:19-21 to this question...

Peter makes it clear that individual repentance is required for that individual’s (“your”) sins to be removed.

Applying Ezekiel 18:20 to this question...

Guilt for sin is not passed down from generation to generation.

Applying Matthew 18:2-3 to this question...

Jesus is teaching us to be innocent like children in order to enter the kingdom of heaven.

Applying Ephesians 2:1-3 to this question...

Paul, in making the point of the grace and salvation that they have received in Christ and a declaration similar to David’s1, reminds them of the sin and darkness they were once a part of without Christ. They were “following” one course, living based on “passions” and fleshly “desires” with a disposition and “nature” toward sin (e.g. “wrath”).

Applying Ezekiel 28:15 to this question...

The king of Tyre was innocent from birth until he began to sin.

Applying Genesis 8:21-22 to this question...

God states man’s intent to sin “from his youth” which is not an intent from his birth.

Extra Context for this Application:

God has just destroyed the earth in a flood, but makes this covenant based on Noah’s righteousness and nature/desire to do good and obey God.

Applying Leviticus 4:1-3 to this question...

The priest is “bringing guilt on the people” because the priest himself has sinned, and as their spiritual leader, has led the people to also sin.

Applying Deuteronomy 24:16 to this question...

Punishment (e.g. guilt) for sin isn’t inherited if each person was “put to death for his own sin” under the Old Law.

Leave your comment below…

…and if you’re wondering more about what we’re doing and why, here are some links we hope can help explain it (and maybe even get you excited about contributing):

what do you think?

related to 'Is the doctrine of original sin taught in the Bible?'

lend your own study to the discussion

PUBLIC COMMENT POLICY: While your email is required, it will not be posted publically.
All comments are vetted for potential spam before being published, but will not be restricted otherwise.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted